Did you know that Web Designers have many dreams? We dream about the end of browser wars, death of IE6, we hope to see the end of raster wars and plead our case to powerful authorities to release more fonts into the public domain or at least distribute new Vista typefaces for other platforms.
While we all wait for the world (or at least the World of Wide Web) to become more beautiful and complete, and beseeching for those wishes to come true, some designers take actions by actually saying good bye to IE6 and dropping support for that browser-dinosaur or doing their best and still managing to produce web sites with such a jaw dropping stunning web typography that would make even some leading print publications green with envy.
Last week I featured dozens of web sites that use only one of the ten core web fonts, Georgia, to delight our eyes with beautiful typography.
Today I’ll be showcasing sites and designers that went down a different path, and by building advantageous CSS font stacks, they recruit the help of nontraditional for Web fonts that allow to spruce up their designs and take them to the next level.
Must read articles on CSS Font Stacks and Font Surveys
Several helpful articles were written about CSS font stacks, yet still many designers fail at implementing them correctly when specifying font names in CSS. Though mastering CSS font stacks is not a rocket science, it’s not as easy as pie either.
Back in 2004 Jeff Croft was urging designers to to open their mind and consider using some of the other typefaces that are often pre-installed on computers these days
. He compiled a list of 20 useable typefaces
along with alternative suggestions that could be used in the font family sequence. Most of the fonts on the list were Mac only, with some that would be hard to find decent alternatives for on other platforms, but it was an eye opening move.
The two hardest obstacles that designers face in building efficient font stacks are the knowledge of the best alternatives to the chosen ideal typeface that exist on other platforms and the percentage (backed up by a reliable statistics) of systems where that font is installed. Code Style has conducted and published a number of helpful font surveys to list the most common fonts on Windows, Mac and Linux. Also VisiBone has published its own Font Survey Results, based on browser shares, by testing 800 systems: 614 PC, 164 Mac, 22 Linux. Though not completely reliable, nevertheless very handy when putting the font sequence together.
In November 2007 Megan McDermot compiled a Complete Guide to Pre-Installed Fonts in Linux, Mac, and Windows. Then Richard Rutter has developed a very helpful Font Matrix and published a valuable article on 24 Ways: Increase Your Font Stacks With Font Matrix.
Last year Nathan Ford from Unit Interactive has stirred up heated debates with his article Better CSS Font Stacks, where he went an extra mile and put together a comprehensive compilation of various font stacks for body copy and headlines. He also offered a PDF for download with the examples of both titles and copy, set in different font stacks.
Christian Montoya was appealing to web designers to add Windows Vista fonts to the stylesheets and has put together a PDF document with Windows Vista fonts compared to typical Web fonts.
Recently Michael Tuck has written a very resourceful article on SitePoint where he presented us with 8 Definitive Web Font Stacks. He’s put lots of thought and work into his research, but unfortunately SitePoint has drastically cut down the article, though gave Michael an option to follow it up with Part 2.
You would think that after all these online publications and the encouragements from fellow designers to think outside of the core web fonts box and experiment with font stacks, we’ll see an explosion of sites that demonstrate the use of unexpected typographic choices. Yet the majority of designers still prefer to go the more traditional route with image replacements and sIFR when using uncommon for Web fonts.
Web Sites with font stacks that stand out
For the last couple months I’ve been collecting sites that exhibit the use of typefaces that are not part of the core web fonts. I won’t be talking too much on whether or not the designers have built efficient and proper font stacks for those site, I will simply present them for you and hopefully we can start some discussions in the comments around the efficiency of those font sequences and perhaps some alternatives.
First choice: Baskerville
First time I saw the use of Baskerville on Web was Jon Tan’s magnificent site. I knew right away that I will use this gorgeous typeface in Inspiration Bit’s new design. Hence, you see it scattered all over this site: in headings, post excerpts, recent posts at the top, personal bits and numerals. Since Baskerville comes pre-installed on Macs only, designers often list it with Palatino Linotype as one of the fallback choices.
JonTangerine
Different design elements get special attention on Jon Tan’s site, so you’ll see that Baskerville, Cochin, Georgia and Times New Roman are all graciously represented there. Here I’ll show you just a few of his CSS font stacks (you can read a complete “investigation” of Jontangerine in one of my previous articles Behind The Scenes Of Exquisite Web Typography):
#aside h2 {
font-family:baskerville,'palatino linotype','times new roman',serif;
}
.personal-note p {
font-family:cochin,baskerville,'palatino linotype',georgia,serif; font-style:italic;
}
Designr.it
Piotr Fedorczyk has set Baskerville for the body
tag and uses it for everything on his stunning web site (once again, you can read a more complete review of Designr in another installation of Behind The Scenes Of Exquisite Web Typography series):
body {
font-family:Baskerville,Georgia,Cambria,Times,Times New Roman,serif;
}
Andrea Gandino
Andrea Gandino’s site is a work of art and fiction at the same time. Everything, starting from the paper textures background to typeface choices to exquisite design details, make this site look more like a precious book. Besides relying on Baskerville for styling headlines and dates, he uses Adobe Caslon Pro for navigation and headings in the content:
#navigation li a, .text h4, .content .text h3, .content h3 {
font-family: "Adobe Caslon Pro", Baskerville, Georgia, Palatino, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-style: italic;
}
.entry .title, .content .title {
font-family:Baskerville,Palatino,Georgia,"Times New Roman",Times,sans-serif;
}
Travis Gertz
Travis Gertz has decided it’s time to play
with his designs, by applying concepts of art direction. His first experiment is set entirely in Baskerville:
body {font-family:Baskerville,Times New Roman,Times,serif;}
Natalie Jost
By setting the body
tag to Baskerville, Natalie Jost gets even her (and site’s) name and tagline displayed in Baskerville. She also uses Verdana on the homepage, Georgia for the form and Frutiger for occasional headings set in h3
.
body {
font: 100% Baskerville, Georgia, Times, Times New Roman, serif;
}
h3 {
font-family: frutiger, arial black, arial, sans-serif;
}
First choice: Palatino/Palatino Linotype
Palatino, along with its Windows alternative Palatino Linotype, is slowly gaining attention from designers. Sometimes they like it so much that use pretty much no other font but Palatino in their stylesheets:
Triimpuls
With the exception of the text in the navigation and comment form, the rest of the content on Triimpuls is displayed in Palatino:
body {
font-family:Palatino,"Palatino Linotype",Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;
}
The Museum of Innocence
p {font-family:"Palatino Linotype",Palatino,Georgia,serif;}
First choice: Lucida Grande
Lucida Grande is becoming a very popular sans-serif alternative to the usual suspects, Verdana, Arial or Helvetica. I too opted on using it for all my auxiliary text in site’s navigation and sections.
Bright Creative
For his company’s web site Dave Shea is using Lucida Grande for the body copy, while styling all headings in Georgia, that’s preceded and replaced by Candara on Vista machines:
body {
font-family:"Lucida Grande","Lucida Sans Unicode",arial,sans-serif;
}
h2, h3 {
font-family:Candara,georgia,serif;
}
Jason Santa Maria
Jason Santa Maria is experimenting with many different typefaces on his remarkable site, as well as various methods for displaying type. However the body text in the master CSS is set in Lucida Sans Unicode/Lucida Grande:
body {
font-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode","Lucida Grande","Lucida Sans",Verdana,Arial,sans-serif;
}
I Love Typography
John Boardley has recently updated the look of iLT and injected more Lucida Grande to go along with Georgia. He might’ve also inadvertently started a petition to bring back the curly brackets for his date styling.
.postMeta, .byline, #middleCol {
font-family:"Lucida Grande",geneva,helvetica,sans-serif;
}
Sundance Festival
Another site with lots of sIFR and image replacements for display fonts, but the main typeface used is once again Lucida Grande:
body {
font-family:"Lucida Grande","Lucida Sans Unicode",Verdana,Geneva,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;
}
Other font choices
Here are examples of sites with miscellaneous font selections and interesting CSS font stacks:
Vitor Lourenco
body {
font-family:"HelveticaNeue-Light","Helvetica Neue Light","Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,arial,sans-serif;
}
Twisted Intellect
Praiseworthy attention to details for what’s remained from a blog. Notice the for the intertwined “oo” in the link to Facebook:
body {
font-family:"Adobe Caslon Pro","Hoefler Text",Georgia,Garamond,Times,serif;
}
.oolig {
letter-spacing:-0.2em;
margin-right:0.2em;
}
Stories & Novels
body {
font-family:"Adobe Garamond Pro",Georgia,serif;
}
Max Voltar
Tim Van Damme’s brave approach to Web Typography is awe-inspiring, Gill Sans for titles adds to the regal look to the site:
h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
font-family:"Gill Sans","Gill Sans MT","Helvetica Neue","Helvetica",Arial,sans-serif;
}
body {
font-family:"Lucida Grande","Lucida Sans",Verdana,sans-serif;
}
Type Tweets
I wonder why Kyle Meyer decided to mix serifs with sans-serifs in his CSS font stack for Typesites? I guess it’s okay in this case, as the entire page relies on one declaration, and because of the smart layout no matter which font is picked up, it would still look good.
body {
font-family:"Lucida Fax",Georgia,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;
}